One Trilogy to Rule Them All
12.02.2006
Voici l’indispensable et jusqu’ici manquante comparaison des trois grandes, récentes, trilogies de S.-F./Fantasy généreusement proposée par l’éminent et très sérieux Dr. Albert Oxford, PhD sur son site Pointless Waste Of Time :
C’est le meilleur diurétique/laxatif du moment. Pire que la combinaison café Delizio+Euronews (bis) du matin.
« Ils sont fous ces Anglais. »
Repreface:
Einstein’s Theory of Relativity states that one object only has certain qualities when in relation to another. Thus, a headless man is only headless in comparison with an equivalent headed specimen. This is why the headless man’s mass will be transformed into energy should he be sent back in time at a velocity greater than light, whereas the headed man’s will not.
In the same manner, a film can only be said to be “good” or “bad” when in quantifiable comparison to other films. A visit to any fan message board will prove this to be amply true:
LegolasPhan@ringbearer.net: hahaha!!11 rotk DESTROYED matrix revlutions fagzs 11 oscer nominations how many did u get LOL
sithsmiter@aol.com: EPISODE3IS GONG2ROXR YR opea.mdauieozzz!!!11 spzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
As you see, even the illiterate know that when weighing the quality of the great sci-fi/fantasy trilogies they must always contest with each other as it is physically impossible for any fan to state that he enjoyed The Matrix: Revolutions unless he equally disapproved of Return of the King and thus has means for comparison.
Contrary to uneducated popular belief, however, we can measure which of the popular sci-fantasy (or “geek”) trilogies is superior through a defined set of scientific criteria that are very real and quantifiable (i.e., Harrison Ford’s performance in the original Star Wars trilogy scored a 8.4 on the Segal Revised Charisma Scale, Elijah Wood scored only a 2.6) and such methods we have employed herein. Let us begin.
Einstein’s Theory of Relativity states that one object only has certain qualities when in relation to another. Thus, a headless man is only headless in comparison with an equivalent headed specimen. This is why the headless man’s mass will be transformed into energy should he be sent back in time at a velocity greater than light, whereas the headed man’s will not.
In the same manner, a film can only be said to be “good” or “bad” when in quantifiable comparison to other films. A visit to any fan message board will prove this to be amply true:
LegolasPhan@ringbearer.net: hahaha!!11 rotk DESTROYED matrix revlutions fagzs 11 oscer nominations how many did u get LOL
sithsmiter@aol.com: EPISODE3IS GONG2ROXR YR opea.mdauieozzz!!!11 spzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
As you see, even the illiterate know that when weighing the quality of the great sci-fi/fantasy trilogies they must always contest with each other as it is physically impossible for any fan to state that he enjoyed The Matrix: Revolutions unless he equally disapproved of Return of the King and thus has means for comparison.
Contrary to uneducated popular belief, however, we can measure which of the popular sci-fantasy (or “geek”) trilogies is superior through a defined set of scientific criteria that are very real and quantifiable (i.e., Harrison Ford’s performance in the original Star Wars trilogy scored a 8.4 on the Segal Revised Charisma Scale, Elijah Wood scored only a 2.6) and such methods we have employed herein. Let us begin.
nda : à cause de ces conneries, j’ai été jeté dans les bras du compromis et ai bien contre mon gré ajouté une catégorie Fantasy à ce blogue.
Archives
Liens
Articles
Commenter